History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ervin Middleton v. Brock & Scott, PLLC
16-2097
| 4th Cir. | Feb 1, 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ervin Middleton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Ervin Middleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Middleton v. Brock & Scott PLLC, No. 1:16-cv-01085-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Ervin Middleton v. Brock & Scott, PLLC
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 1, 2017
Docket Number: 16-2097
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.