History
  • No items yet
midpage
Errico v. Weinstein
44 A.D.3d 657
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2007
|
Check Treatment

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Town of Hempstead Department of Conservation & Waterways dated February 19, 2004, in effect, amending a permit so as to allow Allen Weinstein to construct a floating dock, and to review a determination of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation dated April 26, 2004, granting the application of Allen Weinstein for a tidal wetlands permit to construct the floating dock, and action, inter alia, to recover damages for trespass and nuisance, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), entered September 13, 2005, which, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

*658The Supreme Court correctly dismissed, as time-barred, the causes of action seeking annulment of the subject determinations (see CPLR 217 [1]; cf. ECL 25-0404).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions have been rendered academic in light of our determination. Miller, J.P., Covello, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Errico v. Weinstein
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 2, 2007
Citation: 44 A.D.3d 657
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.