—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated March 9, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Anthony M. Ventura, and granted the cross motion of the defendant Anthony M. Ventura to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him as barred by the Statute of Limitations.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs commenced this action eleven years after the respondent defaulted on his mortgage payments and, accordingly, beyond the expiration of the applicable six-year Statute of Limitations. There is no evidence that the respondent’s promises to pay were intended to lull the plaintiffs into inactivity until after the expiration of the Statute of Limitations, giving rise to an estoppel (see, Bennett v Metro-North Commuter R. R.,