History
  • No items yet
midpage
Erickson v. Lau
130 S. Ct. 2412
SCOTUS
2010
Check Treatment

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, *921and petition for writ of certiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305, and cases cited therein.

Case Details

Case Name: Erickson v. Lau
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 3, 2010
Citation: 130 S. Ct. 2412
Docket Number: No. 09-9531
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.