History
  • No items yet
midpage
Erick Weideman and Roscoe Sawlan, Lester W. Hicks v. Frank Ware
184 F.2d 671
6th Cir.
1950
Check Treatment

184 F.2d 671

Erick WEIDEMAN and Roscoe Sawlan, Appellants, Lester W. HICKS, Appellant,
v.
Frank WARE, Appellee.

No. 11101.

No. 11102.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

October 6, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division; Frank A. Picard, Judge.

Edward N. Barnard, Detroit, Mich., Theodore E. Robbins, Detroit, Mich., for appellants Weidman and another.

Davidson & Kaess, Detroit, Mich., George Gottshall, Detroit, Mich., for appellant Hicks.

Elmer H. Groefsema, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel for respective parties;

2

And the Court being of the opinion that there was substantial evidence of negligence on the part of the appellant Weideman as well as on the part of the appellant Hicks, and that the trial Judge was correct in submitting such issue to the jury with respect to both of said appellants;

3

And no prejudicial error appearing from the record;

4

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Erick Weideman and Roscoe Sawlan, Lester W. Hicks v. Frank Ware
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 6, 1950
Citation: 184 F.2d 671
Docket Number: 11102
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.