Eric Owen MANN, Petitioner-Appellant v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent-Appellee
No. 09-99017
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug. 10, 2015
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that KS Wild’s June notice letter was sufficient notice under the citizen suit notice provision of the ESA, and that there is subject matter jurisdiction in the district court over KS Wild’s suit to enforce the Forest Service’s obligations under Section 7. We do not reach other questions in the suit, leaving them to be addressed by the district court on remand in the first instance.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Amy Kraus, Law Office of Amy B. Kraus, Cary S. Sandman, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.
John Pressley Todd, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent-Appellee.
Jonathan Michael CASTRO, Plaintiff-Appellee v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department; Christopher Solomon; David Valentine, Sergeant, aka Valentine, Defendants-Appellants
No. 12-56829
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Filed Aug. 11, 2015
Argued and Submitted Dec. 11, 2014
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Judges Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.