History
  • No items yet
midpage
Epton v. Hogan
355 F.2d 203
2d Cir.
1966
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellants’ complaint, concerning the alleged unconstitutionality of New York Penal Law § 161 and other statutes, was dismissed with leave to amend. An order dismissing a complaint with leave to amend is not a final order and therefore not appealable. See Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co., Inc., 144 F.2d 387 (2d Cir. 1944); American Broadcasting Co. v. Wahl Co., 121 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1941); 6 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 54.12[1] at 116 (1953).

Appeal dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Epton v. Hogan
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Jan 14, 1966
Citation: 355 F.2d 203
Docket Number: No. 194, Docket 29941
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In