42 Tex. 79 | Tex. | 1874
The defendant being convicted under an indictment for the acquisition of property by a fraudulent representation, moved in arrest of judg
It should have been directly alleged in this case that defendant acquired the side of bacon by means of the fraudulent representation (setting it out) made to Mary-Roland, from whom he obtained it, with such other allegations as would have made the offense complete. This requisition was not fulfilled by averring in the conclusion that Denton Roland was swindled out of the value of the side of bacon by means of such fraudulent representation. That may have been the statement of a correct legal conclusion, from the real facts of the case, but it was not the statement of facts upon which such legal conclusion could be based.
For this defect in the indictment, the motion in arrest
Reversed and remanded.