History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eoff v. Seekatz
136 Okla. 145
Okla.
1929
Check Treatment

This is an appeal from the order of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county made and entered on the 16th day of January, 1928, overruling a motion to vacate the judgment formerly rendered in said cause and to quash a writ of execution.

The record is presented as a case-made, and is also certified to by the clerk of the court as a transcript. An examination of the certificate of the trial judge settling and signing the record as a case-made shows the signature of the trial judge thereto is not attested by the clerk of the court and the seal of the court is not affixed thereto, and as a case-made it is a nullity, brings nothing before this court for review, and cannot be corrected in this respect after the expiration of the six months allowed by law in which to appeal. Campbell v. Williams, 104 Okla. 274, 231 P. 226; State ex rel. Gross v. American National Bank, 107 Okla. 265, 232 P. 52; Hillery v. Cox, 125 Okla. 124, 256 P. 915.

The assignments of error embraced in the petition in error — that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial, in overruling the motion to quash writ of execution, and that the court erred in admitting evidence upon the part of the defendant in error — cannot be reviewed on transcript. Richardson v. Biedleman et al., 33 Okla. 463, 126 P. 817; Davis v. DeGeer, 91 Okla. 111, 216 P. 159; Hillery v. Cox, supra.

There is therefore nothing before this court for review, and the appeal is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Eoff v. Seekatz
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Apr 23, 1929
Citation: 136 Okla. 145
Docket Number: 19375
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.