Enters v. Peres
2 Rawle 279 | Pa. | 1830
— Had the suit been on the mortgage, the witness and the plaintiff having concurrent interests in the land, would have had direct and conflicting interests in the event of the contest, which would have rendered the former incompetent. The action is, however, on the bond, and although the mortgaged premises may possibly be levied under the judgment, that is by no means a necessary consequence, the personal estate of the defendant being equally
Judgment reversed, and a venire facias de novo awarded.