History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ensey v. Culhane
706 A.2d 1334
R.I.
1998
Check Treatment

ORDER

Defendants’ have appealed a Superior Court order denying their motion for summary judgment in this case. Such orders are interlocutory, and are generally not appeal-able. Defendants, however, claim that in light of the significance of the issues involved, they should have the right to an immediate appeal from the Superior Court ruling in this case. They are joined in this contention by amici curiae, the governor, Rhode Island Interlocal Risk Management Trust, and the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns.

After careful consideration of the contentions of the defendants and of the amici curiae, we affirm that appellate review of rulings of this nature is properly obtainable by petition for writ of certiorari. Therefore, permitting defendants an interlocutory appeal is unnecessary in this case.

Accordingly, the appeal is denied and dismissed.

BOURCIER, J., did not participate.

Case Details

Case Name: Ensey v. Culhane
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Feb 12, 1998
Citation: 706 A.2d 1334
Docket Number: No. 97-494-A
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.