History
  • No items yet
midpage
Enkelejda Poci v. Jefferson Sessions
681 F. App'x 649
| 9th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Enkelejda Poci, a native and citizen of Albania, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for *2 abuse of discretion the BIA’s decision to summarily dismiss an appeal. Singh v. Gonzales , 416 F.3d 1006, 1009 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in summarily dismissing Poci’s appeal where she indicated on her notice of appeal that a separate written brief would be filed but failed to file a brief, and her notice of appeal lacked sufficient specificity regarding the grounds for appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(A); cf. Garcia- Cortez v. Ashcroft , 366 F.3d 749, 752 (9th Cir. 2004) (the BIA may summarily dismiss an alien’s appeal if an alien submits no separate written brief or statement to the BIA and inadequately informs the BIA of what aspects of the decision were allegedly incorrect and why).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Poci’s contentions regarding the merits of her case, her ex-husband’s testimony, and the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, because she failed to raise these contentions before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust her administrative remedies. See Tijani v. Holder , 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review contentions not raised before the agency); Fisher v. INS , 79 F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc) (new evidence may be added to the record through a motion to reopen with the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part . 2 15-73661

[*] This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

[**] The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case Details

Case Name: Enkelejda Poci v. Jefferson Sessions
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 14, 2017
Citation: 681 F. App'x 649
Docket Number: 15-73661
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.