History
  • No items yet
midpage
English v. Hogan
71 S.E. 663
Ga.
1911
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

The only grounds contained in the motion for a new trial being that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence and not supported by the evidence, and there being sufficient evidence to 'Support the verdict, there was no error in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: English v. Hogan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 14, 1911
Citation: 71 S.E. 663
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.