History
  • No items yet
midpage
Emray Realty Corp. v. Edwards
11 Misc. 2d 889
| N.Y. App. Term. | 1958
|
Check Treatment
Per Curium.

The application in a summary proceeding to dispossess for nonpayment of rent may be made by the agent of the landlord (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1414; Reserve Finance Corp. v. Rosen, 127 Misc. 591). The corporate landlord could testify through any officer, agent or employee having sufficient knowledge of the facts to testify thereto. Refusal of the trial court to permit the attorney to testify he was the agent for landlord and refusal to permit the landlord’s offer of proof constituted reversible error.

The final order and judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Hecht, J. P., Aurelio, and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Emray Realty Corp. v. Edwards
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Jan 30, 1958
Citation: 11 Misc. 2d 889
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.