175 A. 403 | Pa. | 1934
This action in replevin was to determine title to notes and bonds admitted to have been stolen from plaintiff's assured, to whom plaintiff paid the value of the property as required under its insurance liability.
The material facts in this appeal are so nearly identical with those in Gordon, Secretary of Banking, v. Mapel,
As has already been indicated, the facts disclosed by the testimony in this case bring it within the principal applied in the Mapel Case, cited above. There was an abundance of evidence that the bank obtained the instruments in good faith, and nothing to indicate the contrary. Consequently, there was no question to leave to the jury.
Judgment affirmed. *479