Emery v. Hobson
63 Me. 32 | Me. | 1873
Rescript.
Hobson was bound to keep funds in the bank. He had none after July 6, 1871. Not having any funds, no presentment was essential, and he suffered no injury from, the delay in presentment.
Therefore the testimony outside of the check, as to the purpose of the parties relative to it, was immaterial, even if it was .improperly admitted. Exceptions overruled.