History
  • No items yet
midpage
Emery v. Hobson
63 Me. 32
Me.
1873
Check Treatment

Rescript.

Hobson was bound to keep funds in the bank. He had none after July 6, 1871. Not having any funds, no presentment was essential, and he suffered no injury from, the delay in presentment.

Therefore the testimony outside of the check, as to the purpose of the parties relative to it, was immaterial, even if it was .improperly admitted. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Emery v. Hobson
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1873
Citation: 63 Me. 32
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.