History
  • No items yet
midpage
Emerick v. Kroh
14 Pa. 315
| Pa. | 1850
|
Check Treatment
Per curiam.

— There is no substantial variance. Though the cause of action is called in the statement a promissory note, it is also called a due bill, which in the parlance of the country means a sealed acknowledgment of debt and a promise to pay it. On a demurrer to evidence, we will not look very critically into such exceptions.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Emerick v. Kroh
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 15, 1850
Citation: 14 Pa. 315
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.