Appeal, No. 272 | Pa. Super. Ct. | Dec 11, 1922
This is a proceeding for divorce upon the ground of wilful and malicious desertion. The respondent filed an answer denying the allegation of libellant that he had deserted her and demanding a jury trial upon that alie
The court below has not entered a final decree in this case. Under the provisions of the Act of March 18, 1815, section 2; 6 Smith’s Laws 287, which regulates the procedure in divorce, “If either of the parties shall desire any matter of fact, that is affirmed by the one and denied by the other, to be tried by a jury, an issue shall be framed, and the same shall be tried accordingly.” The issues of fact, if more than one, should be distinctly framed, and the jury should pass upon and find separately as to each. The verdict of the jury determines the questions of fact involved in the issues submitted, but it is not the end of the proceeding. With the facts involved in the issue established, the court' proceeds to determine the cause “as to law and justice shall appertain by either dismissing the petition or libel, or sentencing and decreeing a divorce and separation from the nuptial ties or bonds of matrimony, or that the marriage is null and void,” as provided by the 8th section of the statute. The discharge of this duty by the court necessarily involves the consideration of the evidence as to the marriage of the parties, the residence of the libellant within the Commonwealth for the period necessary t'o give jurisdiction, whether there has been collusion, and all other material facts. It is only after the entry of “the final sentence or decree” that an appeal lies. In the present case it remains for the court below to pass upon the material facts, not involved in the issue tried by the jury, and to enter a final decree, and for that reason, the appeal must be quashed.
Appeal quashed.