History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elmes v. McKenzie
5 Ala. 617
Ala.
1843
Check Treatment
ORMOND, J.

The plea is defective in concluding to the country. Pleas to the jurisdiction .should conclude with a verification. [1 Chitty’s Pleading, 450.] It is true, that in the body of the plea, there is an offer to verify it, but the conclusion of the plea is to the country, which must be regarded as the tender of an issue to the country, as it could not be tolerated that a plea in abatement, should be framed so ambiguously as to leave it in doubt, whether it concluded with a verification or to the country. Matters of form are regarded as substance in pleas in abatement, and are not embraced in our statute abolishing special demurrers. [7 Porter, 445.] So, in England, the statute in relation to th¿ assignment of causes of demurrer, has been held, not to apply to pleas in abatement. [2 M. and S. 484.]

Let. the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Elmes v. McKenzie
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 15, 1843
Citation: 5 Ala. 617
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.