History
  • No items yet
midpage
406 So. 2d 439
Ala. Crim. App.
1981

The petitioner appeals from the summary denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis

The petition contains matters and allegations (among others, ineffective assistance of counsel) which, if true, entitle the petitioner to relief. Since the petition is meritorious on its face, the petitioner should have been afforded a hearing on the merits. Henry v. State, 387 So.2d 328 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980)

We note that the circuit court judge who denied the petition is alleged to be the same judge who accepted the petitioner's guilty pleas and who sentenced him thereon. Undoubtedly, this judge has personal knowledge of the events and circumstances surrounding this case which have not been made a part of this record. However, this Court is bound by the record which contains no evidence to contradict petitioner's allegations

Under these circumstances this Court has no alternative but to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court. This cause is remanded with directions that an evidentiary hearing be held at which the defendant is present and represented by counsel

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS

All Judges concur

Case Details

Case Name: Ellison v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Oct 6, 1981
Citations: 406 So. 2d 439; 1981 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 2466
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Ellison v. State, 406 So. 2d 439