Ellison v. GoordEllison v. Goord
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Struble v Goord,
Also without merit is petitioner’s contention that his prehearing assistance was inadequate and violated his constitutional rights. The record reveals that although petitioner initially was given the wrong procedure forms, the Hearing Officer acted diligently to cure the alleged deficiency (see, Matter of West v Costello,
Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.