History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elliott v. Hardins
107 Ohio St. 501
Ohio
1923
Check Treatment
MARSHALL, C. J.:

1. While an automobile is not a dangerous instri ment per se, it may become such if operated by or who is unskilled in its use; and, where the owner ei trusts such a machine to an inexperienced or incon petent person, liability for damages may arise.

2. Where a father entrusts his automobile to fa-son, a youth of fourteen years, unaccustomed to i1 use, for purposes wholly apart from any business c enterprise of the father, the question of competenc is one for the jury under proper instructions.

3. In such case the liability of the owner woul not rest upon ownership or agency, but upon the con bined negligence of the owner and driver — negligent of the father in entrusting the machine to an incon petent driver, and negligence of the son in its operi tion.

Judgment affirmed.

Wanamaker, Jones, Day and Allen, JJ., concu: Matthias, J., concurs in the syllabus but' not in th judgment.

Case Details

Case Name: Elliott v. Hardins
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 8, 1923
Citation: 107 Ohio St. 501
Docket Number: No. 17634
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.