History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elliott v. Garnett
208 Ala. 697
Ala.
1922
Check Treatment

Appellant's bill was filed with the prayer to vacate a judgment at law, on the ground that appellant had no notice of the suit, and, pendente lite, to enjoin the sale of property under execution. Handy v. Gray (Ala. *Page 698 Sup.) 93 So. 614.1 This appeal turns upon an issue of fact, whether appellant was served with copy of the summons in the action against her; appellant assuming the burden of making clear and convincing proof that the sheriff's return showing service was not true in fact. The evidence has been examined with due care, and our conclusion is that the trial court was right in its judgment dismissing appellant's bill and dissolving the temporary injunction.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

1 207 Ala. 615.

Case Details

Case Name: Elliott v. Garnett
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Oct 26, 1922
Citation: 208 Ala. 697
Docket Number: 8 Div. 369.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.