History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elliott Sheppard v. United States
355 F.2d 206
9th Cir.
1966
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

From an examination of the evidence supporting the conviction of appellant on Count II, we are convinced it was insufficient. The judgment of conviction as to Count II is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the district court with direction to dismiss Count II.

From an examination of the evidence supporting the conviction of appellant on Count III, we are convinced the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. The evidentiary errors asserted by appellant we find to be without merit, under the circumstances here existing. The judgment of conviction on Count III is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Elliott Sheppard v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 31, 1966
Citation: 355 F.2d 206
Docket Number: 19749
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In