History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
225 Conn. 925
Conn.
1993
Check Treatment

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 664 (AC 11185), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Where the defense of alteration/modification of a product is asserted as a defense to a product liability claim, and there is evidence to support that defense, is the defendant entitled to a jury instruction on that defense separate and apart from any instruction on the issue of misuse of the product?
“2. Where it is claimed that misuse of a product is the proximate cause of an injury, and there is evidence to support that defense, is the defendant entitled to an instruction that if the jury so finds, the plaintiff is barred from recovery?”

Case Details

Case Name: Elliot v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 4, 1993
Citation: 225 Conn. 925
Docket Number: SC 14764
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.