| N.J. | Feb 4, 1957

23 N.J. 348" court="N.J." date_filed="1957-02-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ellenstein-v-herman-body-co-1928855?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1928855">23 N.J. 348 (1957)
129 A.2d 268" court="N.J." date_filed="1957-02-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ellenstein-v-herman-body-co-1928855?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1928855">129 A.2d 268

MEYER C. ELLENSTEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HERMAN BODY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 28, 1957.
Decided February 4, 1957.

*357 Mr. Walter J. Bilder argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder & Kaufman, attorneys).

Mr. William A. Ancier argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Rosenthal & Gladstone, attorneys; Mr. Samuel I. Kessler, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Weintraub in the court below.

For affirmance — Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, BURLING and JACOBS — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT — 1.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.