History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris
686 F.3d 1121
9th Cir.
2012
Check Treatment
Docket

Elizabeth Aida HASKELL; Reginald Ento; Jeffrey Patrick Lyons, Jr.; Aakash Desai, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. Kamala D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California; Eva Steinberger, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice

No. 10-15152

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

July 25, 2012

1121

sealed, we conclude that the records should be made public once the parties are permitted to redact sensitive information.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.

Eric Andrew Long, Esquire, Peter C. Meier, Esquire, Paul Hastings LLP, Michael Temple Risher, Staff, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Daniel Powell, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Richard STENGEL; Mary Lou Stengel v. MEDTRONIC INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation

No. 10-17755

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

July 25, 2012

Thomas G. Cotter, Haralson Miller Pitt Feldman & McAnally, PLC, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Michael Kevin Brown and Lisa Marie Baird, Reed Smith, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Elizabeth Haskell v. Kamala D. Harris
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 25, 2012
Citation: 686 F.3d 1121
Docket Number: 10-15152
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.