186 Pa. Super. 243 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1958
Opinion by
This is an appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Allegheny County sustaining an appeal of
Both the decision and the statutory law which govern this case were reviewed by v. in Koolvent Aluminum Awning Co. of Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 233, and we see no reason to repeat here what we said there.
An examination of the findings of the court below convinces v. that its conclusion was correct. In order to explain the operation of the Electric Welding Company we shall quote from the findings of President Judge Lencher, and in doing so we shall substitute “company” for “appellant” to avoid the confusion which might arise from the fact that the appellant in the county court is the appellee here.
The court below found: “Electric Welding Company is a corporation under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, with its administrative office located in the Sherwyn Hotel Building, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and its operating plant or shop situated in the Borough of Canonsburg, Washington County ...”
The company “is engaged in the business of engineering and the application of certain separate plant operations to steel materials from which are obtained concrete reinforcing steel products which are sold to corporations and individuals engaged in the construction of concrete highways, buildings and bridges. The company’s products are (a) concrete reinforcing bars, (b) load transfer units, (e) column spirals, (d) special reinforcing assemblies, (e) wire mesh, Avhich the company concedes is not a manufactured product.
“When an order is obtained from a customer, it is sent to the company’s engineering department. An engineer, trained in concrete design, both through formal education in Avhich an academic degree in engineering Avas conferred and through practical experience,
(a) “Concrete reinforcing bars are designed products for a particular use in the construction of highways, buildings or bridges wherein concrete is a part of the structure. The purpose of concrete reinforcing bars is to strengthen the concrete at specific areas and points of the concrete structure. The reinforcing bars are arranged in place and secured as shown by the construction plans and then concrete is poured around
(b) “Load transfer units are designed products for a particular use in the construction of concrete highways. Load transfer units are put into place transversely on the subgrade of the highway as shown on the general construction plans. The units provide a jointure for two continuous concrete slabs. The purpose of the load transfer units is to transfer the rolling load from one concrete slab to the other, to permit
(c) “Column spirals are designed products for a particular use in concrete building and bridge pier construction. Column spirals are used to reinforce the concrete columns or bridge piers which support the Structure. The spirals are set in place in accordance with the construction plans and then concrete is poured around the spiral. When the concrete hardens, the spiral becomes an integral part of the concrete mass of the column or pier . . . [the engineering work and drafting is done by the company as outlined in para
(d) “There are instances where a problem of reinforcing concrete arises where the appellant is called upon to originate a design that will perform a special or isolated job of strengthening concrete. These special assemblies are used in all types of concrete construction. In some instances the special assemblies are used as an integral part of the concrete by putting the assembly in place and pouring concrete around it. In other cases, the assembly will be a support for concrete and not an integral part of the concrete. Trusses are used in building construction to support a concrete slab. Trusses are laid horizontally between two beams of the building and concrete is poured over them. The trusses at the base of the concrete provides added support to the concrete slab. Pile cages are used in bridge construction. They are sunk vertically into the ground at the point where the piers for the bridge will be located. Concrete is poured into the ground around each of the pile cages and when the concrete hardens, the
After reviewing the decisions, and applying the law to the above facts, the court below concluded, “We think it is plain that Electric Welding Company is a manufacturer in the popular and therefore in the statutory sense. The mercantile taxes are imposed upon persons who buy and sell and not upon those who sell what they make. Electric Welding Company being a manufacturer of concrete reinforcing bars, transverse dowel assemblies, column spirals and special reinforcing assemblies, is not subject to mercantile license taxes in respect to these products. As noAv conceded by counsel, wire mesh is no longer included within this appeal. It is sustained as to the other products.”
The appellant contends that the company is not a manufacturer but a dealer in steel because what it buys is steel, and what it sells is strel. That is like saying that the maker of furniture is not a manufacturer of tables because what he purchases is lumber and what he sells is lumber.
The appellant also contends that the appellee's products are not manufactured because they are sold by the foot or by the pound. The method used to determine the price of a product is not the test of whether or not it is manufactured. Ready-mixed concrete, held in Commonwealth v. McCrady-Rodgers Co., supra, to be manufactured, is usually sold at a price measured by the cubic yard.
There is no doubt in our minds that the load transfer units, column spirals and special reinforcing assemblies (“b”, “e” and “d” above) are “manufactured” by the appellee. Although the question presented by the making of concrete reinforcing bars (“a” above) presents a more difficult problem, we are unanimously of the opinion that they, too, are “manufactured” by the appellee.
Judgment affirmed.