History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eldredge v. Forrestal
7 Mass. 253
Mass.
1811
Check Treatment
* Sedgwick, J.

There is no doubt that an actual cotporeal seisin, or a right to such seisin, in the husband during the coverture, is indispensable to entitle his widow to dower; and that a legal seisin of a vested remainder is not sufficient for that purpose. As in this case there was an interposing estate for life, which was not determined until after the death of the husband, it is very clear that the tenant was not entitled to dower. The proceedings in the Probate Court are void ; and judgment must therefore be entered on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Eldredge v. Forrestal
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1811
Citation: 7 Mass. 253
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.