History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eisenberg v. Tuchman
278 Conn. 909
| Conn. | 2006
|
Check Treatment
899 A.2d 36 (2006)
278 Conn. 909

David S. EISENBERG, Trustee, et al.
v.
Alma TUCHMAN.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 4, 2006.

Charles A. DeLuca and Sarah F. DePanfilis, Stamford, in support of the petition.

Miles F. McDonald, Joyce H. Young, Greenwich, Haden P. Gerrish and Fernando F. deArango, assistant town attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn.App. 364, 892 A.2d 1016 (2006), is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Eisenberg v. Tuchman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 4, 2006
Citation: 278 Conn. 909
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.