History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eigelsbach v. Kanne
184 Ind. 62
Ind.
1915
Check Treatment
Erwin, J.

Appellee brought this action to recover damages for obstructing a flow of water and backing it up on his lands, and for mandatory injunction to compel the removal of the obstructions and to require appellant to restore a tile drain and reconnect it with a tile drain on lands of appellant. Trial was had by the court which resulted in a finding and judgment for appellee.

Appellee filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the same was not perfected in due time. The record discloses that the appeal was perfected according to law. The motion to dismiss is overruled.

Appellee has failed to file any brief on the merits *63of the ease, and under the holdings of this court, it will be considered and taken as a confession of error. Burroughs v. Burroughs (1913), 180 Ind. 380, 103 N. E. 1; 2 Cyc 1024. Judgment reversed.

Note. — Reported in 110 N. E. 549. See, also, 3 C. J. 1446.

Case Details

Case Name: Eigelsbach v. Kanne
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 7, 1915
Citation: 184 Ind. 62
Docket Number: No. 22,945
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.