Edwards v. StateEdwards v. State
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Campbell, Fulmer, Salcines (per curiam)
Appellant argues that his sentence is illegal under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). While аpрellаnt is cоrrect, and wе would nоrmally remand for resеntenсing pursuаnt to Smith v. State, 761 So.2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), this issue has been made moot by appellant‘s release from incarceration on March 10, 2000. Accordingly, we vacate the stay and dismiss the appeal as moot.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FULMER and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.