History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edwards v. Fox
40 App. D.C. 439
D.C. Cir.
1913
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case was tried below in connection with First Nat. Bank v. Fox, No. 2437, ante, 430, and is a suit to recover upon the last of the notes given in consideration of the purchase price of the yacht “Idler.”

*440It differs from tbe former case 'only on tbe question of wbetber appellant was an innocent bolder of the note in due course. Tbe evidence on this question presented a sufficient issue of fact to call for its submission to the jury. It was properly submitted, and tbe jury found for defendant. Tbe remaining exceptions to tbe rulings of the trial court, and the condition of tbe bill of exceptions, are tbe same as in No. 2437.

Tbe judgment, therefore, is affirmed with costs.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Edwards v. Fox
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: May 26, 1913
Citation: 40 App. D.C. 439
Docket Number: No. 2438
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.