History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edwards v. Edwards
519 So. 2d 45
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1988
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in failing to award permanent alimony. See Wagner v. Wagner, 383 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Because we believe that the award of permanent alimony may affect the resolution of the other financial issues decided by the trial court, we affirm the dissolution but remand this case to the trial court with directions that all financial issues be reconsidered. We decline to pass on the other issues raised on appeal because those issues will be subject to reconsideration by the trial court in view of our ruling on alimony. However, we agree with appellant that the trial court also erred in failing to make some award to her for attorney’s fees. The trial court may, in its discretion, determine the need for the presentation of additional evidence and arguments by the parties before entering judgment on remand. Upon remand the parties will be free to make application to the trial court for such a hearing.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Edwards v. Edwards
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 6, 1988
Citation: 519 So. 2d 45
Docket Number: No. 87-0893
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.