81-7724 | 9th Cir. | Nov 26, 1982

693 F.2d 98" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1982-11-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/edward-w-boucher-and-gloria-d-boucher-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-411035?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="411035">693 F.2d 98

82-2 USTC P 9691

Edward W. BOUCHER and Gloria D. Boucher, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 81-7724.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1982.
Decided Nov. 26, 1982.

George Constable, Seattle, Wash., for petitioners-appellants.

Mary L. Fahey, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

Before KENNEDY and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges and JAMESON,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Edward W. Boucher, a life insurance agent, and his wife appeal from a decision of the Tax Court, 77 T.C. 214" court="Tax Ct." date_filed="1981-08-06" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/boucher-v-commissioner-4484509?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="4484509">77 T.C. 214 (1981), holding that Boucher gave insurance 'premium discounts' to his customers during 1974 and 1975 in violation of the 'rebate' statute of the State of Washington; that the statute was 'generally enforced' within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. (I.R.C.1954) Sec. 162(c)(2); and that the premium discounts accordingly were not deductible as business expenses under Sec. 162(a).

2

In Alex v. C.I.R., 628 F.2d 1222" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1980-09-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/james-alex-and-betty-jean-alex-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-381453?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="381453">628 F.2d 1222 (9 Cir. 1980), this court affirmed a similar holding of the Tax Court construing a California rebate statute. We noted that opinions of the Tax Court reflect its special expertise and should not be overruled 'unless some unmistakable question of law mandates such a decision,' quoting from Sibla v. Commissioner, 611 F.2d 1260" court="9th Cir." date_filed="1980-01-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/richard-r-sibla-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-robert-e-cooper-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-372971?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="372971">611 F.2d 1260, 1262 (9 Cir.1980). Id. at 1226.

3

We conclude that the findings of the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous and that its opinion is a well reasoned and correct statement of the law. We adopt it as the opinion of this court.

4

AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable William J. Jameson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.