History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edward Guerra v. State
01-17-00464-CR
| Tex. App. | Nov 28, 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON O RDER ON M OTION Cause number: 01-17-00464-CR Style: Edward Guerra v. The State of Texas Date motion filed [*] : November 20, 2017 Type of motion: Petition for Disclosure of Grand Jury Proceedings and Testimony Party filing motion: Pro Se Appellant Edward Guerra Document to be filed: N/A Ordered that motion is:

 Granted  Denied  Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________

On September 22, 2017, appellant’s appointed counsel timely filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw, which has not been granted pending appellant’s January 17, 2018 pro se Anders response deadline. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 6.5; Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Accordingly, appellant’s pro se “Petition for Disclosure of Grand Jury Proceedings and Testimony” is dismissed as moot because he is currently represented by counsel, is not entitled to hybrid representation, and he has received the appellate records. See Ex parte Taylor , 36 S.W.3d 8 8 3 , 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (stating “[a]ppellants are not allowed to have hybrid representation” and appellant did not have right to file documents with appellate court while represented by counsel). Appellant’s counsel, Kevin P. Keating, is directed to contact the pro se appellant regarding this request.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting for the Court Date: November 28, 2017 November 7, 2008 Revision

Case Details

Case Name: Edward Guerra v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 28, 2017
Docket Number: 01-17-00464-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.