History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edmund Hyatt & Co. v. Tomlin
24 N.C. 149
N.C.
1841
Check Treatment
Gaston. J.

Whatever irregularities may have Occurred in the suing out of the writs against the defendants, these were all waived by their accepting a joint declaration, and putting' in piers in bar thereto. His Honor, therefore, very properly overruled the motion for severing the action.

In no material circumstance, as if regards the other matters presented by the case, does it appear to differ from that of Walton v Tomlin & Co., which was decided here at the last term. I Iredell’s Rep. 593.

We see no error and the judgment must be affirmed.

Pee Curiam, Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Edmund Hyatt & Co. v. Tomlin
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Dec 15, 1841
Citation: 24 N.C. 149
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In