History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edmonds's Appeal
59 Pa. 220
Pa.
1868
Check Treatment

The opinion of the court was delivered, October 29th 1868, by

Read, J.

Relief will be granted in cases of written instruments only where there is a plain mistake clearly made out by satisfactory proofs. But the qualification is most material, since it cannot fail to operate as a weighty caution upon the minds of all judges, and it forbids relief whenever the evidence is loose, equivocal or contradictory, or is in its texture open to doubt, or to opposing presumptions. Such is the language of Judge Story in his admirable Commentaries on Equity Jurisprudence. The proof must be such as will strike all minds alike as being unquestionable and free from reasonable doubt.

Such is not the case before us; the evidence is contradictory and open to doubt, and a plain mistake is not made out by satisfactory proofs, and this was probably the opinion of the learned president judge in the court below. The decree must therefore *223be reversed and tbe bill dismissed, but as there is a suit on tbe common-law side of the court in which this whole'question may be raised and decided, tbe bill is dismissed without prejudice.

Case Details

Case Name: Edmonds's Appeal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 23, 1868
Citation: 59 Pa. 220
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.