History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edmisten v. Edmisten
144 S.E.2d 404
N.C.
1965
Check Treatment
144 S.E.2d 404 (1965)
265 N.C. 488

J. H. EDMISTEN
v.
Margaret Q. EDMISTEN.

No. 366.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 20, 1965.

*405 Louis H. Smith, Boone, for defendant appellant.

Holshouser & Holshouser, Boone, for plaintiff appellee.

PER CURIAM:

From and after the execution of a valid deed of separation, a husband and wife living apart, do so by mutual consent. The prior misconduct of one will not defeat his action for divorce under G.S. § 50-6, brought two years thereafter. Plaintiff's demurrer to defendant's further answer was properly sustained. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Jones v. Jones, 261 N.C. 612, 135 S.E.2d 554; Richardson v. Richardson, 257 N.C. 705, 127 S.E.2d 525.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Edmisten v. Edmisten
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 20, 1965
Citation: 144 S.E.2d 404
Docket Number: 366
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.