208 Ga. 667 | Ga. | 1952
1. In the case against Mrs. Doris Voyles, there was no evidence that she was a member of the union, that she had served on the picket line, or any other evidence that she had notice of the order of the court. The judgment of the court below finding her in contempt was, therefore, error and must be reversed.
2. There was no evidence in the case against D. B. Young to show that he violated the order of the court. The evidence was that, as an arrest was being made, this defendant came up, stood close to the
3. All other questions in the instant case are controlled as to all other defendants by the rulings made in the case of Williams v. Cedartown Textiles, ante, p. 659.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.