History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edgar v. Citraro
112 Cal. App. 762
Cal. Ct. App.
1931
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

This appeal, taken by the defendant Pratt from the judgment for damages entered herein against both defendants, after verdict by a jury, is companion to the one taken by the defendant Citraro from the same judgment, the appeals having been presented on separate records. [1] We have this day determined the latter appeal adversely to the contentions of the appellant therein (Edgar v. Citraro, (No. 7070), ante, p. 178 [297 P. 654]), and in our decision therein we disposed also of all of the contentions made by the defendant Pratt on the present appeal. Therefore, upon the grounds therein stated, the judgment as to the defendant Pratt is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 27, 1931, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 23, 1931. *Page 763

Case Details

Case Name: Edgar v. Citraro
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 25, 1931
Citation: 112 Cal. App. 762
Docket Number: Docket No. 6905.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.