244 S.W.2d 229 | Tex. Crim. App. | 1951
Under an indictment charging the second offense of unlawfully while intoxicated operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway, appellant pleaded guilty before the court and
It is from the revocation of probation that this appeal is brought.
Neither bills of exception nor a statement of facts accompany the record, notwithstanding which appellant insists that the conviction for the first offense of drunk driving, upon which the state relied to make the instant offense a felony, was void because the court in which said conviction was had — that is, the county court of Panola County — was not legally in session at that time. This contention does not appear to have been urged at the time of the revocation of probation. Obviously, without a statement of facts or bills of exception exemplifying the erorr claimed, we have no way by which the contention can be appraised.
The judgment is affirmed.
Opinion approved by the court.