History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edelstein v. Frank
208 A.D. 790
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1924
|
Check Treatment

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements,'and motion to dismiss complaint granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff, within ten days, to serve an amended complaint upon payment of costs. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to cdestitute a cause of action. To enable plaintiff to bring an action of this character, that is, a representative action, she must show that she is a stockholder at the time the action is instituted. (Hanna v. Lyon, 179 N. Y. 107, 110.) The complaint contains no allegation of present stock ownership. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., not voting.

Case Details

Case Name: Edelstein v. Frank
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1924
Citation: 208 A.D. 790
Docket Number: Appeal No. 2
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.