History
  • No items yet
midpage
Edelman v. Latshaw
159 Pa. 644
Pa.
1894
Check Treatment
Per. Curiam,

The prayers of the plaintiffs’ bill could not be granted even if the plaintiffs had a cause of action cognizable in a court of equity, because the stock sought to be recovered had already been sold, and was at the time the bill was filed held by innocent purchasers. But if the facts upon which the cause of action was grounded were all true, there was a complete and adequate remedy by an action at law, and for that reason there is no jurisdiction in equity. The opinion of the learned court below is a sufficient vindication of the correctness of the conclusions reached, and for the reasons therein stated the decree is affirmed. The contest was only over the coal shares. There was no real controversy as to the other shares.

The decree of the court below is affirmed and the bill of the plaintiffs is dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

Case Details

Case Name: Edelman v. Latshaw
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 12, 1894
Citation: 159 Pa. 644
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 79
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.