71 P. 215 | Utah | 1903
after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court
The appellant insists that the court erred in refusing to give his request to charge the jury, as follows: “The negligence of the master need not be the sole efficient cause
It is also insisted on behalf of the appellant that the court erred in refusing to permit the witness McDonnell to answer the following question: “f^nd if the steam valve
We perceive no reversible error in the record. The judgment is affirmed, with costs;