History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eckert v. Truman
158 A.D. 939
N.Y. App. Div.
1913
Check Treatment

After entry of judgment the judgment debtor may appeal by another attorney without any substitution. (Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 656; Cruikshank v. Goodwin, 20 N. Y. Supp. 757; Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695.) Mr. White’s authority to represent Mrs. Truman in these proceedings had since the judgment, stands undisputed by Mr. Davenport, the former attorney of record. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal and to set aside the other proceedings taken in behalf of the appellant is denied, but without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ .

Case Details

Case Name: Eckert v. Truman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1913
Citation: 158 A.D. 939
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.