Eaton v. Village of South Orange
134 A. 917 | N.J. | 1926
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.