Eaton v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.

19 Or. 397 | Or. | 1890

Per Curiam.

The points raised and decided in the preceding cases—Eaton v. O. R’y & N. Co., ante, p. 391—render it unnecessary to consider the main questions suggested by this record. In the views there expressed the instructions were not prejudicial, and the judgment must be affirmed.

midpage