History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eastes v. Daubenspeck
4 Ind. 617
Ind.
1853
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The bill of exceptions in this case, or what purports to be such, does not appear to be signed by any judge. The errors complained of arise upon no other part of the record.

We cannot take any notice of the contents of the alleged bill of exceptions in the absence of the authentication of a judge’s signature.

The judgment is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Eastes v. Daubenspeck
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 31, 1853
Citation: 4 Ind. 617
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.