midpage

East v. Henry Darling Inc.East v. Henry Darling Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 18, 1927
No. 5235
Versions:163 Ga. 760
136 S.E. 895
1927 Ga. LEXIS 58
Per Curiam.

The court did not err in refusing a temporary injunction, because the petitioner had an adequate remedy at law as provided in Civil Code (1910), § 3289.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: East v. Henry Darling Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 18, 1927
Citations: 163 Ga. 760; 136 S.E. 895; 1927 Ga. LEXIS 58; No. 5235
Docket Number: No. 5235
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In